Independent guide to voting and deciding together

Referendum Labeuropeanreferendum.eu

The EU Constitutional Treaty of 2004: What It Was

What the EU Constitutional Treaty of 2004 contained, how ratification stopped after the French and Dutch No votes in 2005 and what the Treaty of Lisbon took over.

Direct democracyPublished

The Treaty establishing a Constitution for Europe, usually called the EU Constitutional Treaty, was signed in Rome on 29 October 2004 by the then 25 member states of the European Union. It was meant to replace the existing founding treaties with a single, more readable text and to reform the institutions of an enlarged Union. It never entered into force: after voters in France and the Netherlands rejected it in referendums in 2005, ratification stopped. Much of its content was later carried over into the Treaty of Lisbon.

This page summarises what the treaty contained, how ratification unfolded and what happened afterwards. It reports events and does not take a position on the treaty.

How the treaty came about

  • 2001: EU leaders agreed to prepare a fundamental reform and set up a convention for that purpose.
  • 2002–2003: a European Convention made up of representatives of national governments, national parliaments, the European Parliament and the Commission drafted a text in public sessions.
  • 2003–2004: an intergovernmental conference of the member states negotiated the final version.
  • 29 October 2004: signature in Rome.

The convention method, with parliamentarians at the table and public debates, was new for EU treaty-making at the time.

What the treaty contained

Area Main provisions
Structure One treaty replacing the earlier ones; the EU would have a single legal personality
Fundamental rights The Charter of Fundamental Rights incorporated into the text
Institutions A permanent President of the European Council; a Union Minister for Foreign Affairs
Voting in the Council Qualified majority as a double majority of member states and population
Competences A clearer list of what the EU and the member states may decide
Participation A citizens’ initiative; a stronger role for national parliaments
Membership An explicit procedure for leaving the Union
Symbols Flag, anthem, motto and Europe Day named in the treaty

The voting rule is explained on double majority; the citizens’ initiative later became the European Citizens’ Initiative.

Ratification and the referendums of 2005

Like every EU treaty, the Constitutional Treaty needed ratification by all member states. Most planned to ratify in parliament; several decided to hold referendums.

Date (2005) Country Type Outcome
20 February Spain Consultative referendum Yes
29 May France Referendum No
1 June Netherlands Consultative referendum No
10 July Luxembourg Referendum Yes

By the time ratification came to a halt, 18 member states had ratified the treaty, two of them by referendum. After the French and Dutch votes, the European Council in June 2005 declared a period of reflection. Several countries that had announced referendums postponed them.

A wider list of votes on European integration is on EU treaty referendums.

Why it failed: the explanations offered

Because a treaty needs unanimous ratification, two No votes were enough to stop it. Why those votes went the way they did has been studied extensively. Explanations put forward in post-referendum surveys and research include:

  • concerns about economic and social issues and about recent enlargement;
  • dissatisfaction with national governments at the time of the vote;
  • the length and complexity of the text and a perceived lack of information;
  • different views on the direction and pace of European integration.

Researchers weigh these factors differently, and they differ between France and the Netherlands. We list them only as reported explanations, not as an assessment.

From the Constitutional Treaty to Lisbon

After the period of reflection, member states agreed in 2007 to abandon the idea of a single constitutional text and instead amend the existing treaties. The result was the Treaty of Lisbon, signed on 13 December 2007 and in force since 1 December 2009.

Constitutional Treaty Treaty of Lisbon
Replaces the existing treaties Amends the existing treaties
‘Constitution’ in the title No constitutional terminology
Union Minister for Foreign Affairs High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy
Charter of Fundamental Rights in the text Charter legally binding by reference
Symbols named in the treaty Symbols not mentioned in the treaties
Double-majority voting Double-majority voting, applied from 2014

Lisbon itself was rejected in an Irish referendum in 2008 and approved in a second Irish vote in 2009. The consolidated treaties are available on EUR-Lex.

Why the episode still matters

The 2005 votes are often cited in debates about how EU treaties should be ratified and whether citizens should be asked directly. Some see them as a democratic correction, others as a sign that complex treaties are poorly suited to yes/no votes. Both readings are part of the debate. For the general mechanics of referendums, see What is a referendum? and the country overview.

Frequently asked questions

Was the Constitutional Treaty a real constitution?

Legally it was an international treaty between member states, like the earlier EU treaties. It was called a constitution because it was meant to bring the founding texts together and contained constitutional elements such as fundamental rights, institutions and the division of competences.

Which countries held referendums on it?

Spain and Luxembourg approved it, France and the Netherlands rejected it in 2005. Several other countries had announced referendums but postponed or cancelled them after the French and Dutch votes.

What is the difference between the Constitutional Treaty and the Treaty of Lisbon?

The Constitutional Treaty would have replaced the existing treaties with one new text. The Treaty of Lisbon amended the existing treaties instead, dropped the term ‘constitution’ and the treaty articles on symbols, and renamed some offices, while keeping many institutional reforms.

More in Direct democracy